1. 1. Reading a price sheet
  2. 2. Input, output, cached
  3. 3. Check yourself
  4. 4. One chip, one dinner plate
  5. 5. Where the power goes
  6. 6. Check yourself
  7. 7. Smaller models, same answer
  8. 8. Watch a model type
  9. 9. Final check

Lesson 7 of 9 · Part 3 · Read · 5 min Draft

Smaller models, same answer

Why the price of a good-enough answer has fallen about 200 times in two years, and how smaller models and slimmer weights help.

The same answer, far cheaper

In March 2023, getting GPT-4’s score on MMLU, a broad test of general knowledge, cost $37.50 per million tokens. By February 2025, Gemini 2.0 Flash matched that score for $0.18. That is about 200 times cheaper in under two years.

Epoch AI, a research group that tracks these prices, found the same pattern elsewhere. For a hard science test called GPQA Diamond, the cheapest model reaching GPT-4’s level got about 40 times cheaper a year. Across the milestones they studied, the fall ran from 9 to 900 times a year.

The trend is older than GPT-4. In November 2021, a GPT-3-level score on MMLU cost $60 per million tokens. In October 2024, a small model called Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B did it for $0.07, about 850 times less.

Small models catch up

Epoch AI names two well-known reasons for the fall: models getting smaller and hardware getting cheaper to run. Some other causes are hard to see from public information. The first reason is easy to spot: a new small model soon matches an old large one. GPT-4 scored well on a coding test called HumanEval at $37.50 per million tokens in March 2023. By July 2024, Llama 3.1 8B, a small open model, matched it for ten cents.

A small model has fewer weights. To write each token, a chip reads every weight once, so fewer weights means less to read. Each token comes out sooner, and the same chip serves more of them.

Slimmer weights

There is a second trick. Each weight is a number, and a number can be stored with more or fewer digits. The usual format uses 16 bits per weight. Squeezing each one into 4 bits makes the model a quarter of the size.

On one H100 chip, an 8-billion-weight model at 16 bits tops out near 209 tokens a second. At 4 bits the ceiling rises to about 838, four times as many. The cost is a little accuracy.

A current example

Claude Haiku 5.5 shows the trend still running. Released on October 7, 2026, it costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens for most prompts. The Haiku model before it cost $1 and $5. Anthropic says Haiku 5.5 costs around 75% less to run on average.

Haiku 5.5 also counts the same text as about 30% more tokens, so the saving on a real document is a bit smaller than the price sheet shows.

A cheaper token is only one side of the story. The study from Part 2 still expects AI datacenters at six large firms to use two to two and a half times as much electricity in 2030 as in 2024.

In one sentence: a fixed level of skill gets cheaper very fast, and one big reason is that smaller and slimmer models soon match what only big ones could do.

Quick check

One question to lock it in. It doesn’t count against you.

Storing a model's weights in 4 bits instead of 16 does what?

Sources